Shakespeare’s Genius

  • Share on Tumblr

the mind of a genius?

Harking back to my blog last week, and the question of whether Shakespeare ever made a mistake in his writing. I have been asked this question or similar ones several times. Do I think Shakespeare is perfect? Are his works without flaw? Was he a genius?

There is a lot tied up with this question and it makes me ask other interesting questions to answer it.

Why is this question asked so much about Shakespeare? Although I have taught many different periods of literature in my career I don’t think I have ever been asked this question of any other author. No one wants to know if Tennyson was perfect, or Dickens, or Larkin or Faulkner or Carter. Presumably students, very sensibly, assume that they were not. So why does this question get asked about Shakespeare? Do we consider him in some way beyond reproof?

Shakepseare’s contemporaries were not afraid to criticise – Ben Johnson said that though Shakespeare wrote without much ‘blotting’ or crossing out, that it would have been better if he had done rather more blotting! Subsequent generations were equally happy to alter Shakespeare’s texts to make them more ‘perfect’ for their audience. But what about today?

Well whilst theatres still cut and in some cases adapt Shakespeare’s plays, academics might be said to have a different attitude. If there are discrepancies in Shakespeare’s plays, inconsistencies, things that don’t add up, then someone, somewhere will publish a paper about it. This paper will often explain the inconsistency as having meaning within the text, as being an apparently deliberate and probably very clever addition to the text. Thus giving the impression that we start from the assumption that Shakespeare was perfect and that it is only our own flaws in interpretation that prevent us from accurate understanding of what only appear to be inconsistencies.

Compare this to Star Wars. There are inconsistencies in Star Wars too. And they too have been studied. Many of them are catalogued in books called the Nitpicker’s Guides. Only in jest does anyone attempt to incorporate them into the story in which they occur. No one attributes them to the scrip writer’s genius.

So, although I think Shakespeare was a great writer do I think he was perfect?

No

Do you?

Tags: , , ,

Author:Liz Dollimore

Someone who loves listening to people talk about Shakespeare Liz tweets at @shakespeareBT
  • http://shakespeare.org.uk Shakespeare Birthplace Trust

    I love your reminder that on one level Shakespeare was so much like is. We are all capable of moments of amazing creativity and if you like the term genius. ^liz

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Annie-Martirosyan/100000005026549 Annie Martirosyan

    He can have flaws and still be a genius :) That’s because the genius moments are more in the plays and they are so genius that the few flaws are but natural sediment of that genius. I do not think we seek perfection in him, but love him for that very tiny flaws which we don’t understand but intuitively perceive and which make him so natural to us, so simple and so much like us, ordinary people with mundane thoughts as often as with out of the blue ideas.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Shakespeare’s Genius | Blogging Shakespeare -- Topsy.com

Download a free book written by Paul Edmondson and Stanley Wells about Shakespeare, Conspiracy & Authorship. Download the Book.